Copy
SQM Research Ratings NewsletterView this email in your browser

 

 
SQM Research Newsletter and Ratings Update - March 2021
Our Research Service provides Ratings, Sector Reviews, Fund Research & Quantitative Analysis for over 10,000 funds.
To subscribe at an affordable price, click
HERE. 
For more information 
contact us today! 

Do we have an Insurance Crisis in our Industry?
by Louis Christopher


Is there a problem with PI Insurance Cover? Take the survey!
 

Based on discussions with a number of leaders in the industry, I have some real concerns that Professional Indemnity (PI), other Director's Insurance and General Business insurance premiums have risen to the point whereby:
  • Advisers might be forced to leave the industry due to the heavy premiums
  • Some advisers and fund managers might be trading without proper cover.

It seems that Covid19 has already aggravated what was a precarious situation for the industry to begin with.

So why is this happening? There are many reasons. Lets cover them off:


An effective oligopoly
It may not surprise you to hear it is a supply side issue. While there are insurers all over the world, the re-insurers (those organisations used by insurers to diversify their claims risk) are small in number and tend to be run out of the UK. Lloyds of London being the single largest re-insurer.
 
https://lmg.london/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/London-Matters-2020-Digital-1.pdf
 

 
Low rates of return on PI Cover
For a number of years (the 80s and the 90s) professional indemnity policies ran on a small margin. And it got to the point where insurers started to walk away from the sector, particularly following the points raised below.
 
PI cover smashed following the Grenfell Towers disaster
The construction sector has been a source of ever-increasing liabilities for insurers, both in terms of the number and value of claims. The construction sector is also one of the largest sectors requiring PI cover.
On that front,  the construction industry is still reeling from the Grenfell Tower tragedy and the continuing uncertainty about the use of combustible cladding in past projects. This of course became a worldwide issue. As a result, re-insurers have had trouble spreading their risk in the construction space. So they responded by lifting premiums in every sector including financial services.
 
Increased Financial Services Compensation and regulation
Worldwide there has been increasing regulation and enforcement of that regulation in the financial services sector, particularly when it comes to financial advice. We know very much over the past 15 years how ASIC have enforced the laws in this country. Of course, many groups have also shot themselves in the foot by not acting in the best interests of their investor clients. Once again, these incidents gave cause for insurers to lift premiums to better reflect the increased claim risk.
 
The Lloyd's Review
At the end of 2018 Lloyd's of London (the worlds largest Re-insurer) conducted a review of its worst performing lines of business. Non-US PI Cover was identified as one of the worst, with claims payouts substantially exceeding premium income. It was reported that in 2017, Lloyd’s syndicates incurred over £100m more in claims liabilities than they received in premiums for non-US architects, engineers and construction risks.
Lloyds reacted with several measures designed to compel improvements in performance, including requiring its insurers to submit plans to ensure a swift return towards greater margins on pure underwriting and so also profitability. For many insurers this meant the end of their presence in the market or substantially reduced capacity.
 
COVID19
The global reach of COVID-19 may have had more significant impact on the reinsurance market as countries around the world face similar accumulations of risk and impacts upon their economies, making it harder to find opportunities to spread localised risks.
 
So what can be done about it?
There is no silver bullet in this. Ultimately premiums will rise to the point where other players re-enter the PI market and create competition. But that could take some years. In the meantime the Australian financial services sector is going to be left reeling and we suspect it will mean a number of fund managers and advisers may be forced to shut down.
 
Is there anything the Federal Government could do? Perhaps ASIC?
Though it is hard to see ASIC providing any lenience to those who quietly trade without PI cover in breach of their licence obligations, perhaps ASIC could consider allowing such companies more time to get insurance if such organisations have been upfront with them.
 
The Government could also consider putting together a government owned co-operative, servicing the sector in the name of investors. After all, it is going to be end investors who will suffer as a result of a further contraction in the financial adviser space.
 
Another option has also recently sprung up. A regional mutual trust/Cooperative pool is one option perhaps recently suggested by Insurer, AMIR.

https://www.insurancenews.com.au/daily/underwriting-agency-proposes-professional-indemnity-mutual
"Asia Mideast Insurance and Reinsurance (AMIR) CEO Adel Dawood says it’s expected the proposal will generate significant interest from brokers who have professional indemnity business they cannot place and from underwriting agencies writing PI risks, where many have had binders restricted or withdrawn."

From our perspective as a researcher of fund managers, we will be shortly asking some pointed questions to rated managers on this front as we have increasing concerns (but no definitive proof as yet) that there maybe a small fringe element trading without PI cover.
At the very least, rampant premium increases will have ramification on fund manager costs which may well feed through to rising ICRs. If so, that is a big negative for the competitiveness of the sector on the fee front.

So is there a problem with PI Insurance Cover? Take the survey!

There are only 2 questions with a tick a box and it is completely confidential. We won't know it is you!

 






















If you’re interested in the details of our rating scale and what it means, please click on this link:
 
https://sqmresearch.com.au/funds/ratings-methodology.php
 

 
There is some good stuff in our archives – check it out at:
 
https://sqmresearch.com.au/funds/newsletterarchive.php




                                          Important Note:
In order to view our rating reports you must be subscribed to SQM Research Ratings research. Click HERE to subscribe

For further information: 
Rob da Silva - Head of Research, SQM Research - Tel: (02) 9220 4606   Email: rob@sqmresearch.com.au
Louis Christopher - Managing Director, SQM Research - Tel: (02) 9220 4666  Email: louis@sqmresearch.com.au

 
About SQM Research 
SQM Research is an investment research house that specialises in providing fund ratings, fund research, investment and property data to financial institutions, investment professionals and investors.
 For more information please visit www.sqmresearch.com.au
 
Research Methodology
The SQM Research rating process is a combination of qualitative and quantitative research techniques to assess financial products such as managed funds. The outcome is a specific star rating (out of a maximum of five stars). Each star rating allows products to be ranked within quarter star increments.

Please see below for descriptions of each star rating, whose purpose is to act as a guide for dealer group research teams and investment committees:

4.5 stars and above - Outstanding. Highly suitable for inclusion on APLs.
4.25 stars - Superior. Suitable for inclusion on most APLs.
4 stars - Superior. Suitable for inclusion on most APLs.
3.75 stars - Favourable. Consider for APL inclusion.
3.5 stars - Acceptable. Consider for APL inclusion.
3.25 stars - Caution required. Not suitable for APLs.
3 stars - Strong caution required. Not suitable for APLs.
Below 3 stars – Avoid or redeem. Not suitable for APLs.
Hold - Rating is suspended until SQM Research receives further information.
Withdrawn - Rating no longer applies. 

 * The definitions above are not all-encompassing. Not all individual items mentioned will necessarily be relevant to the rated Fund. Users should read the current rating report for a comprehensive assessment.


DISCLAIMER
The rating contained in this document is issued by SQM Research Pty Ltd ABN 93 122 592 036. SQM Research is an investment research firm that undertakes research on investment products exclusively for its wholesale clients, utilising a proprietary review and star rating system. The SQM Research star rating system is of a general nature and does not take into account the particular circumstances or needs of any specific person. The rating may be subject to change at any time. Only licensed financial advisers may use the SQM Research star rating system in determining whether an investment is appropriate to a person’s particular circumstances or needs. You should read the product disclosure statement and consult a licensed financial adviser before making an investment decision in relation to this investment product. SQM Research receives a fee from the Fund Manager for the research and rating of the managed investment scheme.
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Website
Copyright © 2020 SQM Research, All rights reserved.
Our mailing address is: Level 16, 275 Alfred Street, North Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia

unsubscribe from this list