May 21, 2015
Data Transparency News
View this email in your browser
The latest:
  • Rep. Darrell Issa and eleven original bipartisan cosponsors introduce Financial Transparency Act
  • Democratic opposition to H.R. 1965 rises, may erect roadblocks to anti-open data bill

Financial Transparency Act of 2015 Introduced, Promising Open Data Across Financial Regulation

Reps. Darrell Issa (R-CA), Ralph Abraham (R-LA), and Jared Polis (D-CO) held a press conference on Wednesday, May 20, to announce the introduction of the Financial Transparency Act of 2015 – the farthest-reaching open data legislation since the passage of the DATA Act last year.

The Financial Transparency Act aims to transform U.S. financial regulatory reporting from disconnected documents into open, searchable data. The bill would require federal financial regulators to adopt consistent data standards for information they collect under the securities, commodities, and banking laws.

Reps. Issa, Abraham, and Polis were joined by Mike Quigley (D-IL), Randy Hultgren (R-IL), Patrick McHenry (R-NC), Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), Keith Ellison (D-MN),  John Delaney (D-MD), Rod Blum (R-IA), Edward Royce (R-CA), and David Schweikert (R-AZ) as original cosponsors. 

The introduction of the Financial Transparency Act helps the Coalition fulfill one of the three major pillars of its 2015 policy agenda. The Data Transparency Agenda calls for legislation to open up financial regulatory data through consistent data standards.

Open data helps investors, regulators, and the financial industry. The companies of the Data Transparency Coalition are ready to republish financial information for investors; analyze it to help regulators find leverage and fraud; and automate reporting to ease compliance costs for regulated entities. All these opportunities depend on the agencies’ mandate to standardize and publish the information as open data – a mandate to be provided, for the first time, by the Financial Transparency Act of 2015.

Read more.

House Committee Approves Anti-Open Data Bill Again – But Without Democrats’ Enthusiasm

The House Committee on Financial Services has voted to approve legislation that would require the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to stop collecting searchable XBRL data from most public companies. Rep. Robert Hurt’s (R-VA) Small Company Disclosure Simplification Act, H.R. 1965, passed, 44 votes to 11. All Republicans voted in support; 14 Democrats voted yes; 11 Democrats voted no.

Before the final vote, every Democrat voted in favor of amendments to narrow the scope of the bill.

This is the second time the Small Company Disclosure Simplification Act has been approved by the same committee. In March 2014, the committee passed the same bill by a more lopsided vote of 51 to 5, with all Republicans and nearly all Democrats supporting. At that time, no amendments were proposed. (Republicans, holding the majority in the House of Representatives, have enjoyed a corresponding majority on the committee’s membership since 2011.)

Democrats’ Support for Amendments Will Raise Future Roadblocks

Even though yesterday's result is technically the same, the implications are different.

A contested bill – with one side uniformly in favor, the other seeking changes – has a smaller chance of becoming law. House leadership is less likely to seek full House passage using the special, fast-track “suspension of the rules” procedure usually employed for minor measures, because suspension requires a supermajority. With every committee Democrat on record desiring changes, the suspension procedure is riskier. Moreover, the bill won’t be included in bipartisan packages built to attract large majorities of Republicans and Democrats (as happened last year).

And the more collegial Senate Banking Committee, rumored to be focusing this year on bipartisan reforms, will put other priorities first.

Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN), who voted for the bill in March 2014 but then changed his views, led the opposition to it this year. In a subcommittee hearing last month, Ellison told his colleagues he’d changed his mind because the cost of XBRL reporting is much lower than claimed by supporters, and the potential value of open corporate financial data is too important to sacrifice. And yesterday Ellison offered the two amendments that, though they failed on near-perfect party lines, showed Democrats’ concerns.

But because H.R. 1965 ultimately passed with a large majority, as Democrats who’d supported amendments nevertheless voted in favor of the underlying bill, supporters of open data will have to continue to share their views with Members of the House beyond the Financial Services Committee and with key Senators.

Ellison Amendment Illuminates Need for SEC Change

Yesterday, Rep. Ellison’s second amendment, even though it was rejected by Republicans, illuminated the need for the SEC to address the justified concerns behind H.R. 1965.

The amendment would keep the original bill’s exemption from XBRL reporting for most public companies – but only until the SEC adopts the inline XBRL format, allowing companies to report their financial statements once, rather than twice. Inline XBRL is both human-readable and machine-readable, and its adoption by the SEC, in place of today’s document-plus-data regime, is the crucial first step to resolve the underlying problems of the SEC’s open data reporting regime.

Thus, the Ellison amendment would have turned Rep. Hurt’s bill into a proactive push for the SEC to take action, sending a clear message to the agency: Move to inline XBRL, or lose the right to collect XBRL data from most public companies. SEC Chair Mary Jo White has told Congress that her agency relies on XBRL data to help protect investors and ensure compliance with securities laws.

The Ellison amendment’s message, even in defeat, should push the SEC to take action. Unless it fixes its underlying failure to make XBRL data work properly for investors, its internal staff, and public companies, Rep. Hurt’s frustration will remain justified and eventually the Small Company Disclosure Simplification Act, or something like it, will pass – and, in fact, should pass!

Read more.


DATA Act Summit
New Speakers Confirmed

Ralph Nader
Grover Norquist
Christina Ho
DATA Act implementation, Treasury
Mark Reger
DATA Act implementation, OMB

DATA Act Summit & DATA Demo Day

June 9th - DATA Demo Day, Capitol Hill
June 10th - DATA Act Summit, Washington Convention Center
Dump-DUNS caucus weighs in on the Data Act
DATA Act standards come with some concerns
Hudson Hollister joined Tom Temin to discuss the introduction of the Financial Transparency Act of 2015

ryce Pippert also joined Tom Temin this month to discuss the DATA Act roll out, schemas, taxonomies, XML, and more.
Joel Gurin's Remarks on the Financial Transparency Act
Hudson Hollister appeared on ABC7's Government Matters program to discuss the latest DATA Act news.
Check us out on Instagram! @datacoalition
Check us out on Instagram! @datacoalition


Teradata Corporation
Research Data Group
RR Donnelley

Booz Allen Hamilton

Accenture Federal
BackOffice Associates
Center for Organizational Excellence
CGI Federal
Elder Research
Global IDs
Information Builders
IRIS Business Services
Level One Technologies
PR Newswire
REI Systems
StreamLink Software

3 Round Stones
BCL Technologies
Gov-PATH Solutions

Trade Association
Object Management Group 

About Us

The Data Transparency Coalition advocates on behalf of the private sector and the public interest for the publication of government information as standardized, machine-readable data. Data transparency strengthens democratic accountability, enhances government management, reduces compliance costs, and stimulates innovation.
Copyright © 2015 Data Coalition, All rights reserved.

unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences 

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp